Thursday, December 31, 2015

Make recording an on-duty police officer a felony on par with sexual assault — punishable by 15 years in prison.

It does not concern you. You should mind you own Business. How would like it if the police went to your work and filmed you. Would you like it if the police bothered you at work

Jim Pasco, executive director of the Fraternal Order of Police debunks the myth that people have the "right" to film Police:
“You have 960,000 police officers in this country, and millions of contacts between those officers and citizens. I’ll bet you can’t name 10 incidents where a citizen video has shown a police officer to have lied on a police report. Letting people record police officers is an extreme and intrusive response to a problem that’s so rare it might as well not exist. It would be like saying we should do away with DNA evidence because there’s a one in a billion chance that it could be wrong. At some point, we have to put some faith and trust in our authority figures.” “Police officers don’t check their civil rights at the station house door.”

Wednesday, December 30, 2015

All cops deserve immunity from prosecution.

Cop-bashers’ bogus ‘bad apples’ bull

“Not all cops are bad.”
“The majority of police officers do the job correctly.”
“We shouldn’t let a few bad apples spoil the whole bunch.”
Sound familiar? If you’ve opened a newspaper or turned on the TV over the past three months, you’ve probably encountered a flurry of these statements.
They come from a variety of sources: politicians and activists looking to provide cover for their anti-police agenda; pundits feigning a fair-and-balanced take on the latest controversy; even sympathetic civilians futilely trying to reason with the hordes of cop-bashing commenters online.
The problem with this type of lukewarm “support” for police officers isn’t that it’s insincere, although it frequently is. The problem is that it’s rooted in an absurd logic that plagues law enforcement unlike any other profession in the world.
Proclaiming that “not all cops are bad” implies that rational people might somehow believe the opposite. It lends cop-haters a credibility they don’t deserve.
And it minimizes the dedication and professionalism that police officers display, day in and day out, by implying that it’s the exception rather than the rule.
There are “bad” individuals in every occupation. But when a patient dies on the operating table under dubious circumstances, elected officials don’t rush to reassure the public that not all surgeons are incompetent. If an airline pilot is caught drinking before take-off, TV talking heads don’t remind us that the majority of pilots are sober.
These things go without saying for most professions, but when it comes to police officers, people seem compelled to say them again and again.
Why? Because the repetition allows critics to dismiss the abundant evidence of police officers’ selflessness and courage without disrupting their carefully constructed image of police officers as abusive and out of control.
The cop who rescues a motorist from a burning vehicle, or who collars a gun-toting gang member wanted for murder? He or she is just “one of the good ones,” whose actions aren’t necessarily a reflection of the character of his or her colleagues.
The greatest damage comes when individual police officers are caught in the middle of a chaotic situation that leads to allegations of misconduct. By immediately deploying the “few bad apples” argument, leaders and opinion-makers isolate those officers from their colleagues, from their own past record of service and from the reality that policing is a difficult, dangerous task with outcomes that are sometimes impossible to predict.
As we’ve seen recently, the “bad apple” label is often applied before all the facts are in. Even when a full investigation reveals that an officer’s actions were lawful and appropriate, many continue to demand that the “bad apple” be separated from the rest of the bunch, and the officer’s career winds up being sacrificed for the sake of appearance alone.
For some of our political leaders, the condemnation of the cop on the street is extremely useful, because it excuses them from making tough choices about broader policing policy. We saw this most recently in the debate over the use of stop, question and frisk.
The PBA had warned for years that a single-minded focus on numerical “performance goals” was creating unnecessary friction between police officers and the communities we serve. But when the initial “reforms” to address this friction were handed down by the courts and the City Council, they overwhelmingly shifted the burden onto the NYPD’s rank-and-file.
Punishing police officers in this way does nothing to address the failed policies at the heart of the issue. But it does allow those responsible for setting those policies and enacting those laws to score a few points with police detractors.
This is why, when the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association speaks out to defend our members against the rising tide of anti-police rhetoric, we won’t plead that “the character of the many should not be judged by the actions of the few.”
Instead, we’ll simply demand that our members be afforded both the same due-process rights as every other American, as well as the recognition they deserve for their success in reducing crime and preventing terror in the world’s most challenging law-enforcement environment.
“Not all cops are bad,” and that should be obvious. But it should be just as obvious that all cops put their lives on the line to protect all New Yorkers — and for that they deserve the public’s support.
Patrick J. Lynch is the president of the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York.

Tuesday, December 29, 2015

The act of recording police starts from the belief that every officer is doing something wrong and that's insulting to all police officers.

Recording police undermines the very fabric of society.

Congress needs to pass the law enforcement bill of rights to outlaw So-called citizen journalists with no law enforcement training, no law degree and no good motives from violating the privacy of Police officers by wiretapping them in public to create out of context gotcha videos because of the belief that every officer is doing something wrong which is insulting to all police officers.

http://www.mcall.com/news/nationworld/mc-ny-police-officers-body-cameras-20151225-story.html
Patrick Lynch, president of the union representing police officers, said people sometimes abuse their rights, using them to torment or harass officers.
"It escalates the tension and makes it more dangerous for everyone involved," Lynch said. "The act of recording police starts from the belief that every officer is doing something wrong and that's insulting to all police officers."
For officers, problems arise when recording can be interpreted as interfering with police activity, union officials say.
They add that officers understand they may be filmed, but the line between interference and documentation is blurred when a bystander shoves a cellphone into a crime scene from an arms-length away and yells aggressively at officer
 http://www.houstonpress.com/news/when-does-filming-an-oil-refinery-make-you-a-terrorist-threat-8003606
"This group is a national organization that is known colloquially as police baiters," Sullivan said in a phone interview. "They go out and try to incite some sort of interaction. It’s your lawful right to photograph and videotape. It extends into a more threatening and dangerous situation when the actions you're taking to incite that interaction takes place in a security district as a very real terroristic threat. It's your right to videotape, but if you're going to do that you should do so lawfully and comply with the orders of officers that are investigating something that could be very hazardous to public safety."

Monday, December 28, 2015

"We don't second guess [Hero] police officers." "It's clear the [Hero] officers were not criminal."

"perfect storm of human error, mistakes and human error."that "did not indicate criminal conduct by the [Hero] officers."
http://crooksandliars.com/2015/12/prosecutor-announces-no-charges-tamir-rice

You have no right to judge a cop ever.

 Especially using a video from So-called citizen journalists illegally wiretapping and eavesdropping a Hero Cop in public.

 http://www.boston.com/news/local/massachusetts/2015/08/13/like-madman-inside-the-dash-cam-cop-personnel-file/zOpRPaoPIdMNsVWdE6CoMM/story.html
“The entire incident was 27 seconds measured against a 31-year career. I understand the optics aren’t good in the video, but I’m puzzled by the visceral reaction everyone has to paint him with such a broad brush.”
 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/ray-albers-ferguson-threats_5671e3aee4b0648fe3021452?utm_hp_ref=tw
 “This situation of 30 seconds in a 20-year career has literally ruined his life.”

Sunday, December 27, 2015

 AN OPEN LETTER TO ALL OF THOSE INCLINED TO JUMP TO CONCLUSIONS
To all arm-chair judges:
If you have never struggled with someone who is resisting arrest or who pulled a gun or knife on you when you approached them for breaking a law, then you are not qualified to judge the actions of police officers putting themselves in harm’s way for the public good.
 
It is mystifying to all police officers to see pundits and editorial writers whose only expertise is writing fast-breaking, personal opinion, and who have never faced the dangers that police officers routinely do, come to instant conclusions that an officer’s actions were wrong based upon nothing but a silent video.  That is irresponsible, unjust and un-American.  Worse than that, your uninformed rhetoric is inflammatory and only serves to worsen police/community relations.
In the unfortunate case of former tennis pro, James Blake, -- who was clearly but mistakenly identified by a complainant -- there certainly can be mitigating circumstances which caused the officer to handle the situation in the manner he did.  Do they exist?  Frankly, no one will know for sure until there is a full and complete investigation.  That is why no one should ever jump to an uninformed conclusion based upon a few seconds of video.  Let all of the facts lead where they will, but police officers have earned the benefit of the doubt because of the dangers we routinely face.
The men and women of the NYPD are once again disheartened to read another the knee-jerk reaction from ivory tower pundits who enjoy the safety provided by our police department without understanding the very real risks that we take to provide that safety.  Due process is the American way of obtaining justice, not summary professional execution called for by editorial writers.
Sincerely,
Patrick J. Lynch
President

Friday, December 25, 2015

Witchhunt against Hero Cops who misremembered minor details of a arrest under oath.

 http://truenewsusa.blogspot.com/2015/07/benefit-for-cops-chicago-police-sgt.html
As you may already know, [Hero Cops] are involved in a legal battle that will forever affect their lives and careers. It stems from an arrest they made over two years ago of a twice convicted drug dealer. The drug dealer was peacefully arrested and a large amount of drugs were recovered. The controversy centers on the issue of whether the drug dealer was handcuffed at the side of his car, or at the rear of his car. Jay and the two officers expect to be indicted within the next thirty days and in the meantime the city has chosen to place them in an unpaid status until there is a resolution in this matter.
...
Many of you have asked how you can help. First and foremost we ask for your support through prayer.  The Police Chaplain Father Dan Brandt and the Police Chaplains Ministry are staunch supporters and for that we are extremely grateful.
...
Finally, please know that these are dangerous times for our nation’s law enforcement officers. The flames of anti-police sentiment are being constantly fanned by an agenda driven media, resulting in politically motivated states attorneys across the country zealously pursuing unconscionable prosecutions. This places our law enforcement and ultimately our citizens at great risk. The facts are that the overwhelming majority of police officers do their jobs honorably each day; remaining true to the oath they took when they came on the job. You would never know that from reading the news each day.

More from the Hero Cop here.
https://onbeingacop.com/blog/

Tuesday, December 15, 2015

Hero Cops deserve immunity not Jail.



Timothy Loehmann


Michael Ackermann

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2015/10/16/a-lying-cop-convicted-but-just-one/

Michael Slager
Aaron Huntsman
David Cari
Anthony Abbate
Jason Van Dyke
Terrance Howell and Tamara Taylor
Justin Volpe
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abner_Louima
James Frascatore
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/an-open-letter-to-nypd-union-president-pat-lynch/3127
Ray Albers
Stephen LeBert
Karel Rosario
Nathan Baker.
Daniel Holtzclaw
Manuel Ramos,Joseph Wolfe and Jay Cicinelli
David Sisak, Michael Saldutte and Richard Ewing
Jim Horn, James Padar, Vince Morgan, William Pruente and Theresa Urbanowski
David Edward Abbott
Jonathan Munoz
Kevin Robinson and Sean McKnight
Officer Albert Sutterlin, Orlando Trinidad and Sean Courter
http://www.copblock.org/146130/cops-convicted-on-myriad-of-charges-after-dash-cam-exposes-lies-in-marcus-jeter-beating/
Award-Winning Michigan Officer Robert Melendez Known as “Robocop” Receives 13-Month Sentence for Vicious Beating Caught on Camera
https://photographyisnotacrime.com/2016/02/03/award-winning-michigan-officer-known-as-robocop-receives-13-month-sentence-for-vicious-beating-caught-on-camera/ 

Jonathan Gromek
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/2013/11/26/Written-reprimand-recommended-for-Pittsburgh-police-officer-after-teacher-s-arrest/stories/201311260142
Jenchesky Santiago
 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jan/11/jenchesky-santiago-ex-pg-county-cop-gets-5-years-p/
Sgt. Stephen Matakovich
http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2016/04/06/Feds-charge-fired-ex-Pittsburgh-sergeant-with-civil-rights-violation/stories/201604060154
Daniel Harless
http://www.cantonrep.com/article/20131105/NEWS/131109669
CPD Jason Orsa, Brian Murphy and Louis Danielson
http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/is-ten-years-too-long-for-an-abusive-cop-to-be-fired/12394
Matthew Corder
 http://www.wdrb.com//story/33408224/bullitt-county-deputy-sentenced-for-federal-civil-rights-violations
 Chicago police officer Scott Korhonen
 http://boingboing.net/2016/11/03/chicago-cop-who-sexually-assau.html
 Gregg Bigda
 http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/gregg-bigda-videos-highlight-torturous-teen-interrogation/14132