Civilians shouldn’t have to de-escalate police
Thank you 
to my friends and people throughout the country who have reached out to 
show support in the wake of my potentially tragic encounter with 
Knoxville Officer Matthew Janish.  I also thank Knoxville Police Chief 
David Rausch for coming to Charlotte to explain the decision not to 
discipline Officer Janish and answer my questions. I am disappointed, 
but not surprised. The system is broken.
 
On May 3, I
 was confronted at gunpoint by Officer Janish while I was putting a 
license plate on an SUV that I purchased from his mother-in-law the 
previous week. The incident occurred in her driveway, which is across 
the street from Officer Janish’s home. Janish, who was off-duty, thought
 I was stealing the truck. After investigating, Knoxville Police 
determined that Officer Janish’s actions were “lawful and proper.”
 
My case is
 another example of how the system is broken. Although my encounter 
didn’t end tragically, it could have, as all too many have (Philando 
Castile, Walter Scott, Michael Brown and others), and his actions likely
 would have still been deemed “lawful and proper.” 
 
The system
 is designed to exonerate police officers, not provide justice for their
 victims. My incident, however, gives me new insight into just how much 
the law values police lives over the citizens they are supposed to 
protect.
 
Chief Rausch said that when 
investigating complaints, it is essential to understand an officer’s 
mindset to determine the facts. A mindset  is not a fact. Here are the facts that Janish appeared to focus on – the unmarked cab, a black person, the duffel bag and the license plate.
Then here 
are other facts that he ignored – he knew his mother-in-law was selling 
the car, it was broad daylight, and I knew her first name, but not her 
last name. I offered to show him the keys, registration and bill of sale
 signed by his mother-in-law.
 
Those are the actual facts. Officer Janish’s mindset was the scenario he created in his head. His fears weren’t facts.
The moment
 I arrived at Officer Janish’s mother-in-law’s house I became a suspect,
 and under the law, it seems that Officer Janish became a victim. He 
could have stayed at his house, called 911 and waited for the sheriff’s 
department to arrive. Instead he grabbed his weapon and came outside to 
confront me. 
 
Had I not 
reacted calmly, Officer Janish likely would have been within his legal 
rights to shoot me although I wasn’t doing anything illegal. My mere 
presence with a duffel bag was deemed a threat. 
 
In her statement, Knoxville Mayor 
Madeline Rogero talked about the extensive training officers receive in 
appropriate use of force and de-escalation. Asking common-sense 
questions, before unholstering a weapon, should also be included in 
police training.
I’m sure 
the situation looked questionable from Officer Janish’s house, but it 
warranted the question “what are you doing?” That’s exercising common 
sense. That’s de-escalation.
 
During his visit, Chief Rausch talked
 about lessons learned. I didn’t overreact. I didn’t get angry. So, I 
survived. He said my behavior is how everyone should act in those 
situations – comply, survive and complain later. But, it’s not natural 
to be accused of doing something wrong and not prove your innocence.
I wanted 
to show him the keys or reach into my bag for the  registration and bill
 of sale. I fought every impulse to do anything that would make him feel
  threatened. I don’t have de-escalation training. I’m the one being 
held at gunpoint. I’m the one thinking my life could end if he panics. 
Yet, I’m the one expected to remain calm.
 
It seems that the legal system is really asking civilians to de-escalate adrenaline-fueled cops. We must remain calm while facing a loaded gun while the trained officers can panic and overreact. What about our lives? Who protects us from the people who are supposed to protect us?
Opinion: The law values police lives over citizens